Home > Basics of Genealogy > How Record Keeping Changed in the 19th Century

How Record Keeping Changed in the 19th Century

Author: Chris Nickson - Updated: 15 December 2010 | Comment
 
Genealogy Records Birth Certificate

Record keeping altered drastically in the 19th century. Although the change is thought of as a product of the Victorian age, it actually precedes the accession of Queen Victoria.

The great transformation involved the government and civic authorities, taking over public records from the church. That meant that everything became centralised, one of the first great works of the modern state.

1836 Act of Parliament

The Act of Parliament that was passed in 1836 created the General Records Office, which would be the repository to collect the new birth, marriage and death certificates. It would be the first time this information had been gathered on a national basis and from July 1, 1837 recording all these events on state forms became mandatory.

What Had Changed?

Prior to this, records relating to birth, marriage and death had all been kept locally by the parish churches (there were also marriage records at Quaker meeting houses and Jewish synagogues, the only other places allowed to conduct marriages).

Once the new Act came into effect, the buildings belonging to other religious denominations could be registered to allow marriage ceremonies, a great leap forwards for the acceptance of other religions.

The parish records didn’t actually record births, though – they recorded baptisms, which didn’t necessarily include the date of birth of the child. Deaths were recorded by burials. These things were fine, but certainly didn’t offer the kind of information a growing state needed.

How it Worked

After 1837 all births and marriages had to be registered. For deaths, a doctor had to issue a death certificate that listed the cause of death. These records were collected by a local records office and kept on file there.

The General Records Office would collect the returns from these offices on a quarterly basis and keep them indexed at the central office in London. Each year would have a quarter ending in March, June, September and December. There was a brief limit to the information in the index, giving only the year and the quarter along with a reference number. From that the requisite certificate could be ordered (for a fee) by an individual.

This collation of information represented a huge step forward and a realisation that the state needed to keep track of the population. By knowing who was born and where, and why people died, the challenges of a modern society could be fully addressed by government.

Census

Also vitally important was knowing just how many people lived in the country. That gave rise to the first census in 1841. This allowed the government to see how the population was distributed, how they lived, and what work they did, as well as the make up of families.

Repeated every decade, they allowed changes in living to be recorded (the censuses covered England, Wales, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man), to established how population altered and shifted. There were also censuses in Scotland, and the first Irish census had been held in 1821.

What it Means

Collecting these records represented the first centralisation of the entire state apparatus. The mechanism of administration meant that accurate, up to date records were necessary. Out of these rose many other things, such as public health, the increase in hospitals and police and fire services, not to mention the real beginning of large public burial grounds that were administered by councils, not the church, and eventually, allowing cremation.

It might perhaps seem strange that changing record keeping could bring about such massive changes in public policy, but it was a necessary first step. So much of the society that we enjoy now is only possible because of the change in record keeping in the 19th century.

You might also like...

Comments...

Why not be the first to Leave a Comment?
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Notify:
  Notify me by email when a response is posted
Validate:
Enter word:
Our Quick Links
Live Comments

moth
Re: Scottish Surnames and Location
Great information here have been doing my family tree and makes me wonder why I have family names of Calder in both my fathers, father and mothers…
14 May @ 5:42 AM

Tamules
Re: Overcoming a Family History Roadblock: A Case Study
This site is a delight to read and was found purely by chance. Many thanks I have been interested in family history for three years now. Having…
30 January @ 8:36 AM

Tina
Re: Tracing Huguenot History in England
Am researching my De'Ath ancestry as ages relatives talk constantly about a Huguenot connection possibly in Suffolk. So far I have reached Francis…
6 January @ 11:29 AM

Finloch
Re: The Clearance and Scottish Emigration
The piece on the Highland Clearances might read well from a romantic point of view but it is very badly researched and historically inaccurate. We…
22 November @ 3:49 PM

foxon
Re: Preparing To Trace Your Family Tree
Hello, I have just read your very interesting and informative article. However the greater interest for me now is that your surname is the same as…
27 October @ 9:56 AM

Yvonne Shirley Liber
Re: What If You Have Asian Roots?
I do have an Indian background (my mother's parents -my grandmother was English and my grandfather was a Hindu from Lyallpur).He held the position…
11 September @ 12:23 AM

Paul
Re: Were Quarter Sessions in Open Court? Is there Public Access?
I am searching for my biological mother. She married a US serviceman in Germany in 1960. Her christian name is Paulette and the serviceman she…
28 July @ 3:01 AM

Alex
Re: Using The Internet to Trace Your Ancestors
Hi there - great article.I was wondering what source you used for the claim that "Genealogy is the third most-researched topic on the World Wide…
17 June @ 12:10 PM

Alloway Lass
Re: Scotland Poor Law Records and Genealogy Research
I have been researching my ancestors who hail from Symington and Straiton. My great-great-grandfather is listed on 1851-1861 & 1871 census as…
9 May @ 3:47 AM

Maurs
Re: Australian Military Records and Family History
Looking for my ancestory from both side of the family
25 April @ 4:05 AM

Also on Explore Genealogy...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the ExploreGenealogy website. Please read our Disclaimer.